Best Asus ROG Swift PG279Q Black Friday Deals 2021 | Cyber Monday

Deal Score0
Deal Score0

There’s lots of things gaming monitors have to nail to be worth the amount of money. The Republic of Gamers Swift PG279Q does practically that with it’s 27-inch, 2,560 x 1,440 display, boasting an extremely low four millisecond gray-to-gray response time, but moreover, G-Sync compatibility and a maximum refresh rate of 165Hz. That’s the best we’ve seen yet, and an excellent 21Hz “better” compared to the previous maximum of 144Hz. Black Friday is here to give you awesome deals and discount right now.

Get Asus ROG Swift PG279Q in cheapest Price in Black Friday & Cyber Monday Sales

Discount on Asus ROG Swift PG279Q in Amazon

Check Other Asus ROG Swift PG279Q Accessories

Check Price Asus ROG Swift PG279Q in Walmart, target, bestbuy, ebay,

But may be the 21Hz jump noticeably better? That’s an integral question that must definitely be answered. The PG279Q’s retail price is $800 – extremely steep for a 1440p display, and about $130 a lot more than Asus’ early 144Hz gaming display. Put simply, you’re paying about six bucks per extra frame of refresh per second. Let’s see if that’s much.

Most monitors are boring to check out, with chunky gray or black bezels mounted on drab silver stands. However the Asus’ PG279Q isn’t most monitors. It combines bezels simply a quarter-inch thick with a big, triangular stand neck, and red LED-backlit accents and Republic of Gamers logo. The appearance won’t be for everybody, but it sticks out without going completely outrageous.

I honestly can’t think about an individual flaw in the PG279Q’s design.

The monitor is really as functional as it is of interest. The wide stand base keeps the monitor set up, as the stand neck provides all of the adjustments expected of an excellent office display; height, pivot, tilt, and rotation up to 90 degrees. There’s also a tiny wire routing cut-out in the stand neck to greatly help tame clutter.

I honestly can’t think about an individual flaw in the PG279Q’s design. Even the backlit logo isn’t so bright to be overly distracting, and it could be switched off if desired.

Input options are somewhat limited with the PG279Q. It provides HDMI 1.4a and DisplayPort 1.2a, and just the latter supports G-Sync. In comparison to monitors all together, this is a restricted collection of connectivity, but it’s actually a lot more than the common G-Sync display provides. The monitor offers two USB 3.0 ports, but they’re saved near to the video inputs and difficult to use.

Menu options
The PG279Q’s on-screen menu is saved in the low right hand flank, as is typical, but operates a lttle bit differently than most. The most notable button is truly a joystick, and can be used to navigate a lot of the options. The joystick could be pressed or tilted to choose options. The other buttons, throughout, will be the exit button, a quick-access button for gaming-related settings, a turbo button (for changing refresh rate), and the energy button.

This scheme is effective, and is easily the very best implementation of a joystick control scheme I’ve yet seen on a monitor. It’s helped by the actual fact the joystick itself is small, smooth and requires little effort to use.

Bill Roberson/Digital Trends
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

It’s good the controls work very well, because there’s too much to navigate. The menu carries a wide range of GameVisualizer pre-sets that are optimized for several genres, five degrees of blue light filtering, color temperature adjustments, brightness, and contrast. But while there’s too much to choose from, there’s very little discrete control. Color temperature settings are simply just “warm” or “cool,” and expert adjustments like color saturation, hue and gamma aren’t included. Arguably they’re not the focus of a gaming monitor, but I believe they should be part of any monitor as technically capable – and expensive – as this.

The star of the show may be the overclocking feature, which permits a refresh rate as high as 165Hz. This is simply not on by default, therefore the monitor is defined to a 60Hz refresh rate out of your box, with a choice to change to 120Hz. Despite the use of the scary term, “overclocking,” setting the monitor to 165Hz is simple to do, requiring nothing except a reboot of the monitor’s firmware. We didn’t notice any unwanted effects from using it, therefore i think most users will transform it on and leave it on for the life span of the monitor.

Pre-calibration quality
Like the majority of monitors, the PG279Q presents an overly bright and intensely bold image out of your box. That’s ideal for a store shelf, but it’s somewhat much for home use. Still, out-of-box image quality is pretty respectable, particularly in the region of color reproduction. Games look well saturated and vivid upon this display. Depth doesn’t surpass quite the same standard, but there’s enough perceived contrast to supply a three-dimensional turn to top quality graphics. The IPS panel provides excellent viewing angles on both horizontal and vertical axis.

Calibrating the display transforms it right into a truly excellent panel.

These impressions were supported by the test outcomes. They found the display’s maximum brightness reaches an unbelievable 391 lux, so that it is among the brightest monitors we’ve ever reviewed. Color gamut came in at completely of sRGB and 78 percent of AdobeRGB, and average color error came in at DeltaE 2.17. Anything below one is known as generally unnoticeable to the naked eye. Surprisingly, the colour error was fairly well distributed – cyan and blue saw the best error, which is normal for LED backlit monitors, however the deviation was significantly less than typical.

Overall, the PG279Q performs well. It isn’t exceptional in virtually any particular area, but it’s in the upper tier of results over the board. There’s just one single exception compared to that – gamma. We measured a curve of 2.4, which is off the mark of 2.2. Most competition come in at the perfect 2.2, or at 2.1. Higher numbers represent darker reproduction of grayscale.

In practice, this signifies that images can look darker than they should. It’s not really a huge concern for gamers, but it’ll be considered a problem for anybody who edits photos, videos, or other digital media, given the monitor provides no option for gamma adjustment.

Post-calibration quality
As the PG279Q performs well out from the box, calibrating the display transformers it right into a truly excellent panel. That is mainly as a result of color accuracy. After calibration the AdobeRGB gamut rose to 79 percent and color accuracy dropped to typically .81, which is near perfection, and the 3rd best result we’ve ever seen – behind the Samsung U32D970Q and the display on the Zenbook NX500 notebook. Contrast happily remained at a good ratio of 630:1 even though my calibration a lot more than halved the utmost brightness of 391 lux to a far more reasonable 120 lux.

Bill Roberson/Digital Trends
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

Nothing I possibly could do changed the gamma curve, though, and that’s likely to remain an issue for anybody seeking to do professional work alongside gaming. In addition, it could be a problem for gamers who enjoy dark games, just because a curve of 2.4 means the display is rendering images darker than it will, which can cause lack of detail in shadowy scenes (you literally might not exactly see the theif that gets you). Fortunately, modern games have in-game tools to improve gamma through software, so that it ought to be possible to tame it.

I also flipped through the refresh rate settings to see if, by chance, they changed image quality. They didn’t – which is what ought to be the case. Color accuracy may be the same at 165Hz since it reaches 60Hz. The blue light filter hurts color accuracy, although display actually manages a delta error of only one 1.5 at the first degree of filter, which continues to be quite good.

G-Sync at 60, 144 and 165 Hz
Testing complete, I kicked back, relaxed and played some games. Generally I stuck to Diablo 3, a long-time favorite of mine, and a casino game that benefits greatly from high refresh rates and frame synchronization. I also played World of Warships and Grand Theft Auto V, games that aren’t as suitable for showcasing the PG279Q.

Try as I would, I couldn’t see much difference between gaming at 144Hz and 165Hz.

I came away liking the monitor a good deal, but not particularly as a result of its high refresh rates. Try as I would, I couldn’t see much difference between gaming at 144Hz and 165Hz. Maybe animations in Diablo 3 looked smoother sometimes, or possibly they didn’t. It’s hard to state. Certainly, the major conditions that are tamed by G-Sync, stuttering and screen tearing, were no different. They’re no different at 165Hz than at 60Hz.

Most games don’t provide full make use of the utmost refresh rate, anyway. Even Heroes of the Storm doesn’t max out the 165Hz potential on our test rig, that includes a Core i7-6700K processor and GTX 980 Ti graphics card. Framerates usually are in the 130 to 140 FPS range. Grand Theft Auto V dips below 60 FPS with all the current details resulted in, and World of Warships includes a strange engine cap of 72 FPS.

Put simply, as the refresh rate is nice to have, I don’t understand that a good 144Hz refresh rate will probably be worth much, never mind 165Hz. The feature functions as intended, {nonet

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Black Friday Deals and Cyber Monday Sales Discount 2020
Enable registration in settings - general