Digitize Your Precious PhotosBoth photography buffs and family archivists often turn to photography scanners to…
Best Fujitsu Scanner Black Friday Deals and Sales 2021
For businesses and offices that contain to scan a whole lot of paperwork, the Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1500 is by far our top recommendation. This scanner can rip through documents at 26 pages one minute, a complete 5 pages faster than its closest competitor. In addition, it produced a number of the cleanest, clearest looking scans inside our testing. In fact, it’s the only document-oriented scanner we tested that people would actually consider using for digitizing photos. It backs that performance up with a reasonably thoughtful program and an extremely intuitive touchscreen interface. If you are searching for a scanner for your document-dealing office, here is the clear choice. The only small exception will be if you regularly scan documents that are longer compared to the 50-page capacity of its computerized document feeder. If so, you may appreciate the bigger 80-page computerized document feeder of the Fujitsu Fi-7160 Sheetfed Color Scanner.
The Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1500 led the field in nearly every among our tests, earning the most notable overall score of the bunch.
The iX1500 turned within an impressive performance atlanta divorce attorneys single among our scan quality tests, earning it the best score in the metric.
The written text documents scanned with the iX1500 generally arrived looking as effective as the originals. Actually, quite often the iX1500 actually made the backgrounds of slightly faded documents look whiter and cleaner compared to the originals. Text characters looked as crisp and clear because they were on the originals documents, and even signatures signed with faded pens came through looking bold and legible.
The iX1500 renders clear typed and hand written text.
Color graphics scanned with the iX1500 looked similarly high-definition. All colors were duplicated quite faithfully inside our tests with no regions of smudging or fading.
Color graphics turn out looking near perfect with the iX1500.
The one nice surprise that arose from our scanning tests was the iX1500’s photography performance. Its photography scanning quality far outstrips that of each of the other document-oriented models we tested, and comes near the caliber of the more photo-oriented flatbed scanners we’ve had our practical. Just remember, images need to bend somewhat to be fed through the scanner, so that it might not be the very best picture digitization tool if you need to keep carefully the originals in mint condition.
Photos scanned with the iX1500 come near the caliber of photo-oriented flatbed scanners.
The only real minor complaint we’ve with the iX1500’s scanning performance, and the only real reason it didn’t earn an ideal score in this metric, may be the fact that it tended to create some smudges when scanning receipts. However, every receipt we scanned was still correctly legible, which means this really isn’t a concern in real-world use.
The iX1500 was the king of our speed testing, posting an extraordinary rate of 26 pages each and every minute.
Add a 50-page programmed document compared to that speed and you could get through a whole 50-page document in under 2 minutes. Why, with this field-leading speed, did we award a high Pick for High Volume Scanning to a new model? Because, despite the fact that the Fujitsu Fi-7160 Sheetfed’s speed of 21 pages each and every minute is appreciably slower compared to the iX1500, it includes a larger, 80-page computerized document feeder. Which means you can scan longer documents without needing to decelerate and reload the document feeder. This helps it be a slightly better choice if you are regularly scanning 50+ page tomes.
The Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1500 may be the most effective scanner we’ve tested.
Most areas of the iX1500’s software packaged are smartly designed and easy to use, but we did discover a few slightly annoying issues. This earned it an above average, however, not top-shelf, score.
Generally, we found the iX1500’s software to be quite intuitive and user-friendly. We’d no issues installing it on both PCs and Macs nor setting it up to speak to the scanner itself. General file management and settings adjustments likewise felt quite painless and simple to figure out. In addition, it has a large number of smart features, just like the ability to scan right to a variety of cloud services. More impressive yet, it could automatically sort documents predicated on file type (document, business card, receipt, etc.) and may automatically name documents predicated on their content. Neither of the features is ideal, but both work very well enough to include an appreciable degree of convenience.
The downsides are two-fold. First, though no model that people tested displayed correctly accurate optical character recognition, the iX1500 missed some more words than most of the other models we ran through the paces. The accuracy was still north of 90%, but almost every other models could actually stay nearer to 100% accuracy. Second, we occasionally ran into trouble changing the default destination folder for scans, particularly if using the scanner with a Mac. It often took a few attempts at changing the default folder until scans actually finished up being deposited there. You’re most likely not likely to change your destination folder all too often, so it likely will not be too large of a deal, and incredibly well could disappear in subsequent software updates.
The Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1500 offers premium performance, but also asks reduced price . In the event that you work within an office or own a business that will require the digitization of plenty of paper documents, that extra performance is really worth the excess price. However, if your weekly scanning jobs don’t regularly break well into triple digit page numbers, both Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1500’s performance and price are overkill.
The Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1500 is the better option in the marketplace for busy offices that has to regularly scan a huge selection of pages, but is much too expensive for all those that don’t scan in high volumes.