There has been no shortage of direct-drive, DJ-friendly turntables available through the years. Models by…
Best Pioneer DJ Plx 500 Black Friday Deals 2020
A home orientated, cheaper option to the PLX-1000. Its not constructed as ruggedly, and lacks the variable pitch control range, nonetheless it gets the same high torque direct drive motor – and introduces a USB record output, meaning you can rip your vinyl directly into Rekordbox. Its also obtainable in white, unlike the 1000. Additionally you get all of the extras you will need in the box, including dust cover with jacket stand, a slipmat, and a silver edition PC-HS01-S headshell (cartridge and stylus included).
First Impressions / Establishing
The Pioneer DJ PLX-500 can be an entry-level turntable designed for ripping vinyl and home use.
The PLX-500 is a direct-drive turntable with three speeds: 33, 45, and 78 RPM. It looks nearly the same as the PLX-1000 or and the Technics 1200: it includes a power knob, a start / stop button, target light, a tonearm and tonearm assembly that appears like what you’ll find in a typical Technics 1200 or PLX-1000, and a pitch fader that enables you to change platter boosts to -/+ 8%.
It’s heavy, however, not as heavy as a Technics 1200 or PLX-1000 though. It doesn’t look cheap for a budget deck, though it really feels on the cheaper end so far as DJ turntables go, which is due to several things:
The PLX-500 is manufactured almost totally of plastic, although platter, pitch control, and tonearm are constructed of metal.
First, the unit’s shell is manufactured almost totally of hard plastic. Sure, it’s got much base inside, but almost anything else is plastic, like the top and bottom plates. Because of this, all together, the deck is more vunerable to vibrations and accidental bumps, items that normally occurs throughout a DJ set.
Next, the metal tonearm feels lighter compared to the PLX-1000, and the assembly is made from plastic. Again, less mass ensures that it’s more vunerable to those little jolts and nudges, that could potentially move the needle out of its groove.
The PLX-500 ships using its own headshell, cartridge and stylus, plus a slipmat, dust cover, and 45 adapter.
Lastly, the metal platter underneath isn’t as dense as the PLX-1000. It doesn’t feel as solid as the flagship.
The PLX-500 includes everything you need to begin with DJing or ripping tunes: a headshell with a Pioneer DJ cartridge and stylus (the PN-X05), a slipmat, dust cover, USB cable, and a 45 adapter for playing 7″ records.
Behind the machine you’ll locate a USB jack, phono/line output switch, a couple of RCA leads, and a power socket.
It includes a USB jack in the trunk for ripping vinyl to your notebook via Rekordbox, some wired RCA jacks, a phono/line output switch which means you don’t have to plug in the RCA jacks to a phono input (eg you’re connecting this to a home stereo), and a power socket. No grounding lead here, folks.
I hooked up some them to my DJM-450, create the tonearm and cartridge, and surely got to work.
I tried the PLX-500 with actual vinyl first – I paid attention to some Pink Floyd and Psychedelic Furs, and the PLX-500 was fine as a new player. The sound was decent, and the included Pioneer DJ cartridge was up to task. Nothing to report here – it worked fine. For general playback and hearing music in your bedroom, it’s certainly a lot more than capable, especially in comparison to cheaper turntables that contain popped recently as a result of vinyl revival.
Next, I needed to try ripping some tunes, therefore i hooked one PLX-500 to to my notebook computer via USB and thrilled Rekordbox, that includes a vinyl recording feature. Again, no issues and it worked fine. Up to now, so excellent. My expectations are being met, which got me worked up about my next test, that was spinning.
I tried spinning some old dance records I had, and it had been then that the PLX-500 showed its blemishes: as the pitch control was responsive or more to task for pitch bends, I came across that the headshell would grab thumps and noises even though I’d just gently tap or nudge the deck. If you’re a careful DJ, then this wouldn’t be considered a problem, however in a rough gig situation, this isn’t desirable. That is as a result of the rather hollow build that the PLX-500 is cased in.
I also needed to be a bit gentler when it found accelerating the spindle and slowing the platter edge with my fingers – the motor doesn’t seem to be to have as high a torque as that of the PLX-1000, which again is understandable since that is a budget model. I did so some digging: the PLX-1000 can begin up in 0.3 seconds, as the PLX-500 takes up to 1 second to totally start. It appears like a tiny thing, but this produces a noticeable difference in performance.
Cueing a track was also somewhat more challenging for the reason that lower motor torque ensures that you’ll need to nudge the record forward with a lttle bit more force to get it up to date. Not really a total deal breaker, but someone to take into account.
Still, I could mix and beatmatch between two records. Admittedly, it had been quite satisfying to learn that I possibly could still do it in the end these years of DJing on a controller, and be honest, it felt I had switched gears and was performing a different, more introspective design of DJing since there weren’t any screens around (and because I was playing some obscure minimal techno that I can’t pronounce).
The PLX-500 was starting to show its weaknesses, nonetheless it was still usable; certinaly much better than the shoddy couple of belt-drive decks I began with in the past when. As such, I still had a smile on my face when I visited my final use test: scratching.
Here’s where it gets ugly for the PLX-500. The combo of its plastic build and motor resulted in problems for me personally when it found scratching. I needed a lighter touch to avoid the platter from stopping while I was doing some basic scratches, and it took some time for the platter to spin at its full speed once I forget about the record.
This helps it be quite challenging to accomplish more intermediate / complex scratch phrases. Without doubt a skilled turntablist should be able to change accordingly, nonetheless it may cause frustration for beginners, and intermediate DJs can tell the difference after simply a few tries.
Also, since you’re more “practical” with the deck when you scratch, additionally you potentially introduce more noise, and there’s a fair amount of this here if you aren’t careful. Again, if you’re scratching or practising in the home then it can be permissible, however in a loud club at a DJ booth where a variety of rowdiness happens, it could wrap up compromising your set or scratch routine.
For home scratch use, it’s passable, but definitely leave the decks in your DJ studio and don’t take them to gigs.
Using the PLX-500 with Rekordbox DJ was the very last thing on my list. It doesn’t have a Rekordbox DVS licence, and you nevertheless still need to attach a Rekordbox DVS-enabled mixer or DJ controller to your laptop. I’ve a licence and timecode vinyl that include my DDJ-RZ, therefore i tried it out. Setting it up setup and calibrated was a breeze (as may be the case with DVS nowadays).
Generally, it had been fine and it had been DVS as you’d expect it to be, however there have been several times that I’d hear some nasty “wobble” artifacts – perhaps that is as a result of Rekordbox DJ or Rekordbox DVS and a pat