Best Polar A370 Black Friday Deals 2021

Deal Score0
Deal Score0

Our Verdict
A smarter-than-average fitness tracker that may GPS track your runs and walks by making use of a phone. Battery life is relatively poor, though, and it’s bulkier than a lot of the competition.

Phone notifications
Can GPS track runs with the aid of a phone
All-day HR tracking
Only 2-day battery life with all features started up
Chunkier than the competition
GPS not in-band
Polar is a company known, historically, to make heartrate sensors and hardcore GPS tracking watches – but its new fitness tracker, the Polar A370, is a lot more mainstream.

It could track your exercise (by using a phone), tries out some smartwatch features with notifications, and can monitor your heartrate whether you’re sat within an office or running in the fitness center.

When compared to old Polar A360, you now get the addition of GPS tracking of runs (through your phone, not on the band) and 24/7 heartrate sensing.

However, use these extras and the Polar A370 doesn’t last for very long between charges. And for more basic activity tracking it doesn’t offer you as immediate a fix as the Fitbit Alta HR.

It’s got the proper bits, but it’s also very costly at $179.95/£169.50/AU$299, and with tough competition at the purchase price is it worth your cash?

Design and comfort
Smart but relatively large and chunky design
Watch-like rubber strap
The Polar A370 looks almost specifically just like the Polar A360, its predecessor. In pictures, in addition, it appears similar to something similar to the Garmin Vivosmart 3 or Fitbit Alta. However, it’s actually much bigger.

The width of the band and the distance it extends either side of your wrist are drastically longer compared to the Vivosmart 3’s. Its silver-on-black look may appeal, but next for some of your competition it’s just a little ungainly.

Like the majority of bands, the Polar A370 includes a rubbery strap and a plastic module in the centre.

It’s a curious middle ground between a straightforward fitness band style and that of an effective runner’s watch just like the TomTom Runner 3. Unfortunately, the result is that of an earlier-generation wearable.

The Polar A370 can be not the preferred band around. For exercise, you must do up the watch-like strap fairly tight to get a good heartrate reading, but as such it will leave some pretty serious indents in your skin layer because of the strap’s contouring. Sometimes it also gets a lttle bit itchy by the buckle.

Much like any observation of the sort, the body may react differently, and these quibbles are relatively minor. Worn just a little looser the Polar A370 feels fine. The Fitbit and Garmin bands certainly win in the comfort stakes, though.

Low-res display with classic unsightly LCD pixelation
Good outdoor visibility however, not always-on
Nice touch-friendly glass surface
Among the slightly unusual factors of the Polar A370 is that it includes a glass display covering, as being a phone. There’s no reference to any brand-name toughening, like Gorilla Glass, but this will make it undertake scratches less readily than plastic.

Glass also increases the touchscreen feel, and the touch display is the key way you operate the Polar A370. It feels much such as a smartwatch display, and the program can be more responsive when compared to a large amount of fitness trackers. It might not exactly move as fast as your fingers can flick, but it’s smooth and fairly quick.

The display can be set to carefully turn off when dangling with you, which might irk some, nevertheless, you can transform this to be always-on (although it’ll come at the battery price).

Other factors of the Polar A370 display aren’t so impressive. Practically all fitness trackers have either no screen at all or a little, low-resolution one.

More often than not it’s no problem, but this band includes a slightly different issue that means it is less appealing to read.

It’s a color LCD of 80 x 160 resolution. The problem isn’t that one could see pixelation, but that you may see between your pixels, with just a little border of black around the RGB sub pixels that produce each noticeable ‘dot’.

In a $180/£170/AU$300 device, it’s an inexpensive look. As that is an LCD, with a backlight instead of individually lit pixels, the display doesn’t meld in to the surround either.

It’s not really a pretty screen regardless if it is a lot more colorful than most, however in pure practical conditions it’s fine.

It gets the brightness to handle very bright days without becoming all-but invisible and the backlight automatically adjusts to ambient light conditions – so regarding raw usability, the Polar is effective there.

However, regarding just how it looks there’s simply a feeling that – {speci

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Black Friday Deals and Cyber Monday Sales Discount 2020
Enable registration in settings - general